IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v4y1994i2p119-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The French connection and other neo-colonial patterns in the global network of science

Author

Listed:
  • Luc W Nagtegaal
  • Renger E de Bruin

Abstract

International co-operation in science between the West and the third world often follows neo-colonial patterns. In this article these patterns are quantified, using the science of bibliometrics. The authors suggest methods to create a ‘Neo-Colonial Relations Index’, in which the neo-colonial dependency in science of the various countries is put on a scale. This allows such dependency to be placed in a comparative framework. These data are then linked to qualitative analysis that puts scientific relations into perspective. Thus, it is demonstrated that Africa south of the Sahara is the scientific backyard of West Europe, and that the intellectual domination of the West is growing rather than diminishing. Finally there is a recommendation for a change in European science policy. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc W Nagtegaal & Renger E de Bruin, 1994. "The French connection and other neo-colonial patterns in the global network of science," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 119-127, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:2:p:119-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/4.2.119
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nelius Boshoff, 2009. "Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(2), pages 413-434, November.
    2. Ortega, José Luis & Aguillo, Isidro F., 2013. "Institutional and country collaboration in an online service of scientific profiles: Google Scholar Citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 394-403.
    3. Rey-Rocha Jesús & Martín-Sempere María José, 2004. "Patterns of the foreign contributions in some domestic vs. international journals on Earth Sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 59(1), pages 95-115, January.
    4. W. Glänzel & A. Schubert & H. -J. Czerwon, 1999. "A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 45(2), pages 185-202, June.
    5. Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2018. "Scientometric research assessment in the developing world: A tribute to Michael J. Moravcsik from the perspective of the twenty-first century," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1517-1532, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:2:p:119-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.