IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v4y1994i1p45-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a postpositivist approach to policy evaluation?

Author

Listed:
  • J E Glenn

Abstract

The normative ideal which currently governs policy evaluation has been outdated by the changing nature of demands on the evaluation process. For the small group of social scientists reviewed here, the growing complexity of policy evaluation demands that it take into account the normative dimensions of public policy. This approach remains in its infancy and much more work needs to be done on assessing the capacity of existing evaluation strategies to include these normative dimensions. At present the brightest promise for postpositivist policy evaluation is its ability to inform a new generation of evaluators about the politically contentious nature of such evaluation. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • J E Glenn, 1994. "Towards a postpositivist approach to policy evaluation?," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 45-54, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:1:p:45-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/4.1.45
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:1:p:45-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.