IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v4y1994i1p31-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transferring knowledge to influence ‘small p’ policy development: examples from the implementation of integrated service delivery systems

Author

Listed:
  • Michael P Shea
  • John H Lewko

Abstract

Knowledge transfer from program evaluators to policy-makers and program decision-makers should not be left to chance. Experiences gained from a multi-site implementation evaluation highlight a number of strategies and techniques which evaluators may employ to increase the likelihood that their findings may be utilized to influence the development of ‘small p’ program polices and procedures. The evaluators in this situation engaged in a number of pre-evaluation activities which both enhanced and protected their ability to transfer knowledge about program implementation to program stakeholders when it became available. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael P Shea & John H Lewko, 1994. "Transferring knowledge to influence ‘small p’ policy development: examples from the implementation of integrated service delivery systems," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 31-36, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:1:p:31-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/4.1.31
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:4:y:1994:i:1:p:31-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.