IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v3y1993i3p204-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evaluated … in changing webs of significance

Author

Listed:
  • Elvi Whittaker

Abstract

Epistemologies and theories change rapidly; many certainties are evaporating behind the closed doors of the intellectual academies. These trends are having an effect on the evaluation of the social sciences and humanities, and a whole new vocabulary is developing. The objects of evaluation need to be rethought and reconstituted in this era of post-modernism. Much can be learned from evading the duality of the developer and the developed and looking at the process of development itself Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Elvi Whittaker, 1993. "The evaluated … in changing webs of significance," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 204-207, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:3:y:1993:i:3:p:204-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/3.3.204
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:3:y:1993:i:3:p:204-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.