IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v3y1993i3p187-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government approaches to evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Erik Brofoss

Abstract

An overview is given of research evaluations in Norway with special emphasis on research institutes. These evaluation efforts are best characterised as very heterogeneous. There is so far no approach which is dominant and there is no consensus on which aspects of an institute's activities should be included in an evaluation. Some evaluations concentrate on organisational aspects, others solely on research quality, and others on the interaction between research establishments and policy institutions. There is a need for a more integrated approach in which each of these aspects is part of the evaluation and they can mutually benefit from each other. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Erik Brofoss, 1993. "Government approaches to evaluations," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 187-195, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:3:y:1993:i:3:p:187-195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/3.3.187
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:3:y:1993:i:3:p:187-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.