IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v3y1993i2p107-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outputs, structure and process in the evaluation of social science research centres

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Tiler
  • Andy Boddington

Abstract

Using the evaluation of two social science research centres as an example, this illustrates the distinctive contributions made through the analysis of the outputs of research, the structures within which it is organised and the processes by which it is carried out. Quantitative and qualitative data are combined in ways which are sensitive to the contingencies faced by each Centre. The process is necessarily uneven, since some indicators may be inappropriate. The details of the methodology adopted must therefore be tailored to each evaluation, whilst retaining a common approach designed to establish a sound basis of fact and quantitative analysis. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Tiler & Andy Boddington, 1993. "Outputs, structure and process in the evaluation of social science research centres," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 107-116, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:3:y:1993:i:2:p:107-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/3.2.107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:3:y:1993:i:2:p:107-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.