IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v33y2024ip191-200..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changing conceptualization of innovation in the European Union and its impact on universities: Critical junctures and evolving institutional demands

Author

Listed:
  • Ridvan Cinar
  • Paul Benneworth
  • Lars CoenenMohn

Abstract

This article explores underlying mechanisms triggering a change in conceptualization of innovation in the European Union (EU), the impact of this change on institutional demands upon European universities and implications for evaluation procedures. We mobilize the theoretical concept of critical junctures to explore significant periods that have affected understanding of innovation in the EU as well as institutional expectations from universities. Through an analysis of European policy corpus relating to innovation, we identify three distinct periods, 1983–6, 1995–2000, and 2008–12, entailing fairly fundamental shifts that have considerably broadened the understanding of innovation and then demonstrate the way this broadening conceptualization has affected institutional demands upon universities. Following this, we discuss the implications of the critical junctures on evaluation approaches. We conclude by arguing that different approaches towards innovation have created complex institutional environment for universities to navigate and suggest that implementing more nuanced and customized evaluation schemes aligned to the institutional demands of each critical juncture could help addressing this complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ridvan Cinar & Paul Benneworth & Lars CoenenMohn, 2024. "Changing conceptualization of innovation in the European Union and its impact on universities: Critical junctures and evolving institutional demands," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 33, pages 191-200.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:33:y:2024:i::p:191-200.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvad006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:33:y:2024:i::p:191-200.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.