IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v31y2022i1p49-60..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of rice research: An alternate method to capture outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Parshuram Samal
  • Biswajit Mondal
  • Nitiprasad N Jambhulkar
  • Onkar N Singh
  • Ramlakhan Verma
  • Sushant K Dash
  • Anup K Das
  • Himanshu Pathak

Abstract

Policy-makers, research managers, and donors are interested in knowing the outputs, outcomes, and impacts of investment in agricultural research. Several institutions are engaged in rice research and impact assessment of rice research requires area coverage information for rice varieties. The area coverage information for individual varieties is not available at the national level in many developing countries as the conventional household survey method is expensive and time-consuming. This article aims to find a cost-effective and quick method to estimate the area under popular rice varieties in India and their spread in different states. Secondary data collected from 27 states and 1 union territory of India were used to estimate the area. The results of the new method compared well with some of the studies conducted at the state level. The most important varieties identified using the new method were Swarna, Cottondora Sannalu, Samba Mahsuri, Vijetha, IR-64, and Ranjeet, which covered more than 1 million ha each in the country. On geographical coverage, IR-64 has spread to 17 states followed by Swarna, Cottondora Sannalu, Samba Mahsuri, Vijetha, IR-36, and Swarna Sub-1 which covered 14, 14, 12, 11, 11, and 10 states, respectively. The area information can be used to compute returns to rice research by different research institutions and study dynamics of varietal change over time. The popular varieties identified should be used in future breeding programs and biotechnological studies for the development of superior varieties.

Suggested Citation

  • Parshuram Samal & Biswajit Mondal & Nitiprasad N Jambhulkar & Onkar N Singh & Ramlakhan Verma & Sushant K Dash & Anup K Das & Himanshu Pathak, 2022. "Evaluation of rice research: An alternate method to capture outcomes," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 49-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:49-60.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvab024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samal, Parshuram & Mondal, Biswajit & Jambhulkar, Nitiprasad Namdeorao & Verma, Ramlakhan & Das, Anup Kumar & Singh, Onkar Nath, 2023. "Evaluation of crop research institutes under data and resource constraints: An alternative approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:49-60.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.