IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v30y2021i4p552-562..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Being a female academic under neoliberal evaluation: A systematic review
[I Want to Be Both but Is That Possible?”: Communicating Mother-Scholar Uncertainty during Doctoral Candidacy]

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Mula-Flacón
  • Cristina Cruz-González
  • Jesús Domingo Segovia
  • Carmen Lucena Rodríguez

Abstract

The current academic assessment system is drawing a scenario based on neoliberal values. It has contributed to the perpetuation of gender inequalities. This systematic literature review aims to synthesize the most relevant research on the impact of neoliberalism on the professional identity of female academics. For this purpose, a systematized bibliographic search was carried out in four different databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Education Resources Information Center, and Google Scholar), which yielded a total of 26 articles published in international journals. The results illustrate a research field dominated by the USA and the UK and a trajectory of growth in the literature in recent years. The emerging themes reveal some of the challenges faced by women academics in a neoliberal context. These obstacles may be external and even unconsciously imposed by women academics themselves. Motherhood emerges as one of the most influential aspects of their professional development. Furthermore, our findings explore various ways in which women academics reconstruct their identity in the face of systemic challenges. This manuscript culminates with a discussion of the impact that neoliberal values and their general consequences in the performance evaluation processes of academics have on women. Therefore, we provide a number of implications for professional practice and future lines of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Mula-Flacón & Cristina Cruz-González & Jesús Domingo Segovia & Carmen Lucena Rodríguez, 2021. "Being a female academic under neoliberal evaluation: A systematic review [I Want to Be Both but Is That Possible?”: Communicating Mother-Scholar Uncertainty during Doctoral Candidacy]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 552-562.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:552-562.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvab025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:552-562.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.