IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v30y2021i4p540-551..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers conceptualizing and developing assessment for skill development: Trialing a maker assessment framework
[A Brief History of Inquiry: From Dewey to Standards]

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Lock
  • Sandra Becker
  • Petrea Redmond

Abstract

A makerspace is a place where people create artifacts while sharing ideas, equipment, and knowledge. In so doing, makers develop a range of knowledge and skills, such as creativity, problem-solving, collaboration, and self-regulation, to help them achieve their goals. These skills are broadly touted as key for learning and transferable across disciplines and making contexts. This article will first review the state of play in the literature to assess skill development. Secondly, itreports on the trial of an assessment framework developed through a literature review and implemented in a maker learning environment with an elementary school context. Finally, the article concludes with implications for practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Lock & Sandra Becker & Petrea Redmond, 2021. "Teachers conceptualizing and developing assessment for skill development: Trialing a maker assessment framework [A Brief History of Inquiry: From Dewey to Standards]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 540-551.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:540-551.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvab029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:540-551.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.