IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v30y2021i1p57-72..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mirror, mirror on the wall: is economics the fairest of them all? An investigation into the social sciences and humanities in Vietnam
[Cash Bonuses for Peer-Reviewed Papers Go Global]

Author

Listed:
  • Quan-Hoang Vuong
  • Anh-Tuan Bui
  • Viet-Phuong La
  • Minh-Hoang Nguyen
  • Hung-Hiep Pham
  • Thanh-Hang Pham
  • Thi-Hanh Vu
  • Thu-Trang Vuong
  • Manh-Toan Ho

Abstract

Three major scientific policies implemented in 2008, 2014, and 2017 have pushed Vietnam’s social sciences and humanities (SSH) toward higher international standards. This study uses descriptive and Bayesian approaches on a dataset of 1,564 Vietnamese authors in the 2008–18 period to understand the changes under the new policies and the remaining challenges. The findings indicate that Economics is the most productive SSH field, with 858 publications in 11 years. Even though the number of authors has risen rapidly, gender disparity is still an issue. Economics has benefitted the most from Vietnam's development, and to a lesser extent, so have Education and Social Medicine. Future policies should aim to provide an enabling environment for female and early career researchers in every SSH field in Vietnam. The study calls for responsible usage of cross-discipline publication data to maintain a transparent source of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan-Hoang Vuong & Anh-Tuan Bui & Viet-Phuong La & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Hung-Hiep Pham & Thanh-Hang Pham & Thi-Hanh Vu & Thu-Trang Vuong & Manh-Toan Ho, 2021. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: is economics the fairest of them all? An investigation into the social sciences and humanities in Vietnam [Cash Bonuses for Peer-Reviewed Papers Go Global]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 57-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:57-72.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaa036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Le, Tam-Tri, 2022. "Planning for a new mindsponge-based methodological book," OSF Preprints bwz59, Center for Open Science.
    2. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2021. "The bayesvl R package and ISR’s publications using Bayesian inference," OSF Preprints rx3c6, Center for Open Science.
    3. Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Tam-Tri Le & Hong-Kong To Nguyen & Manh-Toan Ho & Huyen T. Thanh Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2021. "Alice in Suicideland: Exploring the Suicidal Ideation Mechanism through the Sense of Connectedness and Help-Seeking Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Manh-Toan Ho & Ngoc-Thang B. Le & Manh-Tung Ho & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2022. "A bibliometric review on development economics research in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 2939-2969, October.
    5. Le, Tam-Tri & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2022. "A journey of SM3D: looking back at notable studies," OSF Preprints a8pju, Center for Open Science.
    6. Mindsponge, AISDL, 2022. "Release of guide for bayesvl version 1.0," OSF Preprints rs3zb, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:57-72.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.