IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v30y2021i1p127-140..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdisciplinary knowledge combinations and emerging technological topics: Implications for reducing uncertainties in research evaluation
[Blade Runner Economics: Will Innovation Lead the Economic Recovery?]

Author

Listed:
  • Seokbeom Kwon
  • Jan Youtie
  • Alan L Porter

Abstract

This article puts forth a new indicator of emerging technological topics as a tool for addressing challenges inherent in the evaluation of interdisciplinary research. We present this indicator and test its relationship with interdisciplinary and atypical research combinations. We perform this test by using metadata of scientific publications in three domains with different interdisciplinarity challenges: Nano-Enabled Drug Delivery, Synthetic Biology, and Autonomous Vehicles. Our analysis supports the connection between technological emergence and interdisciplinarity and atypicality in knowledge combinations. We further find that the contributions of interdisciplinary and atypical knowledge combinations to addressing emerging technological topics increase or stay constant over time. Implications for policymakers and contributions to the literature on interdisciplinarity and evaluation are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Seokbeom Kwon & Jan Youtie & Alan L Porter, 2021. "Interdisciplinary knowledge combinations and emerging technological topics: Implications for reducing uncertainties in research evaluation [Blade Runner Economics: Will Innovation Lead the Economic," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 127-140.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:127-140.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaa029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kwon, Seokbeom, 2022. "Interdisciplinary knowledge integration as a unique knowledge source for technology development and the role of funding allocation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Nicola Melluso & Francesco Alessandro Massucci, 2022. "Exploring the antecedents of interdisciplinarity at the European Research Council: a topic modeling approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 6961-6991, December.
    3. Guoyang Rong & Changling Li & Zhijian Zhang & Shuaipu Chen & Yuxing Qian, 2024. "Investigating the application of work–energy metaphor in interdisciplinary citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 3573-3591, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:127-140.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.