IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v28y2019i4p394-404..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas

Author

Listed:
  • Lise Degn
  • Niels Mejlgaard
  • Jesper Wiborg Schneider

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present an alternative method for science mapping, which remedies some of the classic limitations to e.g. using co-citation analysis as a mapping tool. With the emergence of new, more complex and interdisciplinary areas of research it becomes important to adjust our understandings of how to study these areas, and the argument of the present paper is that in order to provide high-resolution maps of emerging scientific areas, we need to start in the ‘cognitive colleges’ of the research areas themselves. To do so, a mixed methods design with co-nomination as its backbone is proposed. The potential and limitations of the alternative approach to science mapping are discussed based on an empirical example of mapping an vaguely defined research area in Denmark.

Suggested Citation

  • Lise Degn & Niels Mejlgaard & Jesper Wiborg Schneider, 2019. "Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 394-404.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:28:y:2019:i:4:p:394-404.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvz025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas, Duncan Andrew & Ramos-Vielba, Irene, 2022. "Reframing study of research(er) funding towards configurations and trails," SocArXiv uty2v, Center for Open Science.
    2. Maria Karaulova & Maria Nedeva & Duncan A. Thomas, 2020. "Mapping research fields using co-nomination: the case of hyper-authorship heavy flavour physics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2229-2249, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:28:y:2019:i:4:p:394-404.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.