IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v24y2015i3p312-324..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities (1998–2013)

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Li
  • Yajun Miao
  • Jing Ding

Abstract

This study focuses on the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities. Using the science structures of Mainland China, the world, and the world’s top 10 universities as three reference standards, we measure the disciplinary structure ‘distance’ between the Chinese ‘985 universities’ and the references, and analyze whether the 985 universities are moving toward or away from the reference groups (RG) in terms of disciplinary structure. The results show that most of the 985 universities’ disciplinary structures are very similar to China’s science structure. The disciplinary structure distances between the 985 universities and both the world reference and the world’s top universities reference have narrowed recently, but the overall degrees of similarity are still low. Another important finding is that the rise of biomedical science has played an important role in the 985 universities’ move from a native ‘sci-engineering focused’ structure to an international ‘bio-science focused’ structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Li & Yajun Miao & Jing Ding, 2015. "Tracking the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities (1998–2013)," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 312-324.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:24:y:2015:i:3:p:312-324.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvv013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jielan Ding & Per Ahlgren & Liying Yang & Ting Yue, 2018. "Disciplinary structures in Nature, Science and PNAS: journal and country levels," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1817-1852, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:24:y:2015:i:3:p:312-324.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.