IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v23y2013i1p79-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of academic research in public health policy and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret A. Lemay
  • Creso Sá

Abstract

This study sought to gain a better understanding of the ways in which users access academic research, by observing decision-making at the micro level in a public health unit (PHU) in Ontario, Canada. The overarching question guiding the study is as follows: how do PHU staff members access, engage with, and make use of academic research in order to advance their mandate? Ethnographic methods were used to collect data from direct observations and informant input, augmented by document review. A two-dimensional (2D) continuum of research use was adopted as an organizing heuristic. Research use was shown to be highly dynamic, spanning (spatially) across and transitioning (temporally) through both dimensions of the 2D organizing heuristic. While this research focuses on the context of use, it acknowledges interactions with the other contexts. This study suggests that users may have more 'agency' in the ways in which they engage with and use research. The full range of possibilities discussed is critical for accurately documenting the impacts of academic research. Findings should be relevant to other sectors where research use capacity is being developed. Copyright The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret A. Lemay & Creso Sá, 2013. "The use of academic research in public health policy and practice," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 79-88, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:79-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvt029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:79-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.