IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v20y2011i4p305-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracing from applied research programs to downstream innovations: value in multiple techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalie Ruegg
  • Patrick Thomas

Abstract

One approach to evaluating research and development investment, the historical tracing method, traces interrelated events over time to assess if and how R&D has spawned downstream developments of commercial or other interest. Recently the authors have added to the body of evaluative studies using this method by conducting five historical tracing studies for the US Department of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office. This paper draws on the five studies to illustrate the value of using a combination of tracing techniques. The value is in not missing critical linkages between R&D and outcomes, and in providing multiple lines of evidence of linkage. This paper highlights the value of patent citation analysis in providing objective, quantitative evidence of linkages that is developed in a non-intrusive manner. The discussion may provide useful insights to program managers and researchers considering the use of the method for evaluating R&D programs. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosalie Ruegg & Patrick Thomas, 2011. "Tracing from applied research programs to downstream innovations: value in multiple techniques," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 305-312, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:305-312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820211X13118583636034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:305-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.