IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v20y2011i1p7-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indicator needs for the internationalisation of science policies

Author

Listed:
  • Jakob Edler
  • Kieron Flanagan

Abstract

Science has long had an international dimension but policy-makers, research funders and research-performing organisations now pay increasing attention to research internationalisation, with a range of motives. Despite this, the evidence base for internationalisation strategy formulation remains weak. In this article we elaborate an approach which identifies likely indicator needs from the policy process, explore examples of existing indicator use, and discuss the extent to which meeting each of our identified indicator needs is feasible. We conclude that decision-makers and indicator designers should work together to ensure that both new indicators and new approaches to mutual policy-learning about their use and utility are developed in parallel. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakob Edler & Kieron Flanagan, 2011. "Indicator needs for the internationalisation of science policies," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 7-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:1:p:7-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820211X12941371876148
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdulkader A. Murad & Dimitar T. Tomov, 2012. "Institutionalization and internationalization of research on the applications of the geographical information systems in health planning," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 143-158, April.
    2. Sokolov, Alexander & Shashnov, Sergey & Kotsemir, Maxim & Grebenyuk, Anna, 2019. "Quantitative analysis for a better-focused international STI collaboration policy: A case of BRICS," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 221-242.
    3. Ricard Esparza-Masana, 2022. "Towards Smart Specialisation 2.0. Main Challenges When Updating Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 635-655, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:1:p:7-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.