IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v19y2010i3p217-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of the autonomy and interdependence of individual researchers on their production of knowledge and its impact: an empirical study of a nanotechnology institute

Author

Listed:
  • Kasia Zalewska-Kurek
  • Peter A T M Geurts
  • Hans E Roosendaal

Abstract

This article discusses how to organise and manage research to get the best performance out of researchers in terms of use of their produced knowledge. To this end we extended the strategic positioning theory developed to predict the level of the production of knowledge. The strategic positioning theory considers researchers as agents who reach their goals by collaboration, i.e. by sharing their resources. In this way researchers acknowledge being strategically interdependent with other researchers, while at the same time retaining some autonomy in taking decisions. As it turns out in a test on researchers of an institute for nanotechnology, the higher the interdependence and the better this is aligned with autonomy the higher the impact and citations of their produced knowledge. The theory explains largely the variance of the impact and citations of produced knowledge. It is concluded that researchers need to share resources to be highly performing: research management is advised to stimulate this sharing in combination with a commensurate degree of governance in directing research. Given specific domains and organisational conditions, the theory can serve as a tool in setting research programmes as it gives insight on which settings could and should be created by research managers or policy-makers. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Kasia Zalewska-Kurek & Peter A T M Geurts & Hans E Roosendaal, 2010. "The impact of the autonomy and interdependence of individual researchers on their production of knowledge and its impact: an empirical study of a nanotechnology institute," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 217-225, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:217-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820210X503474
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kasia Zalewska-Kurek & Rainer Harms, 2020. "Managing autonomy in university–industry research: a case of collaborative Ph.D. projects in the Netherlands," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 393-416, April.
    2. Kasia Zalewska-Kurek & Klaudia Egedova & Peter A. Th. M. Geurts & Hans E. Roosendaal, 2018. "Knowledge transfer activities of scientists in nanotechnology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 139-158, February.
    3. Xiaozan Lyu & Rodrigo Costas, 2021. "Studying the characteristics of scientific communities using individual-level bibliometrics: the case of Big Data research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6965-6987, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:217-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.