IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v19y2010i3p185-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Referencing through history: how the analysis of landmark scholarly texts can inform citation theory

Author

Listed:
  • Henry Small

Abstract

Responding to Ton van Raan's critique of citation theories, this article explores referencing in landmark scientific texts for clues to a viable citation theory. The evolution of the modern bibliographic reference is described, the earliest form being authors commenting on other authors or themselves. Landmark scientific texts by Aristotle, Newton, Lavoisier, Darwin, and Einstein are examined for their referencing practice. The frequency distribution of author names mentioned in their texts conforms to the usual skewed distribution we find in reference analysis of modern scientific papers. Biographical background is given to explain why individual authors cited or failed to cite relevant prior work, and evidence is found for the emergence of a citation norm in the course of their careers. This norm is shown to support an author's claims to priority. The explanation of the differential or skewed distribution of citations may lie in the susceptibility of certain texts or authors to distinctive linguistic labeling which facilitates the adoption of this usage in the broader community. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry Small, 2010. "Referencing through history: how the analysis of landmark scholarly texts can inform citation theory," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 185-193, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:185-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820210X503438
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Carley & Alan L. Porter, 2012. "A forward diversity index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 407-427, February.
    2. Staša Milojević, 2012. "How Are Academic Age, Productivity and Collaboration Related to Citing Behavior of Researchers?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Tahamtan, Iman & Bornmann, Lutz, 2018. "Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 203-216.
    4. Rodrigo Costas & Thed N. Leeuwen & María Bordons, 2012. "Referencing patterns of individual researchers: Do top scientists rely on more extensive information sources?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(12), pages 2433-2450, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:185-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.