IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v17y2008i4p235-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction: The use of evaluation to illuminate scientific innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Gretchen Jordan
  • Brian Zuckerman

Abstract

This issue has an edited selection from over 50 papers presented to the Research Technology and Development Topical Interest Group of the American Evaluation Association during the AEA 2007 conference. The six papers in this collection fall into two subgroups. The first three take as their subject evaluation tools that assist researchers and research managers in identifying priorities, objectives, and the choice of which science to fund. The other three focus on evaluating the results of scientific progress, asking, ‘Are collaboration and networks proving effective in bringing together stakeholders in the process of doing innovative science and in translating results into use?’ Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Gretchen Jordan & Brian Zuckerman, 2008. "Introduction: The use of evaluation to illuminate scientific innovation," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 235-236, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:17:y:2008:i:4:p:235-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820208X392787
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:17:y:2008:i:4:p:235-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.