IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v16y2007i4p283-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific versus economic specialisation of business R&D — the case of Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Antje Klitkou
  • Aris Kaloudis

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between specialisation patterns in science, technology and economic performance in Norway by using the following indicators: business R&D specialisation, economic specialisation in terms of value-added and employment, and scientific publications involving Norwegian industry compared with scientific publication patterns in the country. Important economic sectors have been identified and their research and publication output analysed. It is demonstrated that these sectors are unusually active in research activities compared to EU15. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Antje Klitkou & Aris Kaloudis, 2007. "Scientific versus economic specialisation of business R&D — the case of Norway," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 283-298, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:283-298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820207X259308
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bolwig, Simon & Bazbauers, Gatis & Klitkou, Antje & Lund, Peter D. & Blumberga, Andra & Gravelsins, Armands & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2019. "Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 440-452.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:283-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.