IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v16y2007i3p183-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and management of multi-departmental (horizontal) science and technology programs

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Montague
  • George G Teather

Abstract

In Canada, there has been a recent increase in the number of horizontal or multi-departmental programs with higher level objectives beyond the mandate of any one department. These programs are designed to take advantage of the capabilities of several organizations to address major national policy objectives. Two examples of horizontal programs are discussed, with differing degrees of cooperation and interaction among the participating departments. Management of these initiatives requires the participating organizations to work cooperatively, an approach that is contrary to the culture of many organizations. Evaluation of multi-departmental programs requires greater attention to early outcomes associated with smooth functioning of the relationships between the participating organizations and with stakeholders as a necessary requirement for program effectiveness and achievement of objectives. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Montague & George G Teather, 2007. "Evaluation and management of multi-departmental (horizontal) science and technology programs," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 183-190, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:183-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820207X235106
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:183-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.