IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v16y2007i1p23-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research productivity and the journals system: a study of immunology and microbiology authors

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Rowlands
  • René Olivieri

Abstract

This paper considers the role that the journals system plays in supporting scientific productivity: a critical issue for publishers, librarians and research managers at a time of considerable upheaval in scholarly communication, notably the rise of open access models. The survey findings presented here support the unfashionable view that reader open access is something of a non-issue for the two author communities studied: corresponding authors in immunology and microbiology. Other issues, notably how financial and human resources are organised and deployed appear to be much more serious issues for biomedical researchers. The key policy implication of this work is that Europe could improve its research performance by listening more carefully to its scientists and harnessing those resources more effectively. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Rowlands & René Olivieri, 2007. "Research productivity and the journals system: a study of immunology and microbiology authors," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 23-34, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:1:p:23-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820207X196759
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:1:p:23-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.