IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v33y2020i12p5555-5593..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Government in Firm Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Duchin
  • Zhenyu Gao
  • Haibing Shu
  • David Denis

Abstract

Using a unique setting in China, where the geographic distance between collective firms and local governments is highly persistent because of legal restrictions on land ownership and mobility, we investigate the role of government involvement in small firms. In our analysis of survey responses, we find that weaker government involvement, measured by greater distance from government, is associated with higher firm autonomy and reduced taxes, protectionism, and anticompetitive behavior. In our analysis of firm-level financial data, we find that distant firms have better operating performance, higher growth, and higher entry rates. We find similar results around exogenous government office relocations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Duchin & Zhenyu Gao & Haibing Shu & David Denis, 2020. "The Role of Government in Firm Outcomes," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(12), pages 5555-5593.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:33:y:2020:i:12:p:5555-5593.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhaa005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yujing Huang & Xiujuan Li & Minggui Yu, 2024. "Assessment of local officials and government‐initiated CSR: Evidence from targeted poverty alleviation in China," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 557-579, March.
    2. Wang, Yatong & Qiao, Zhi & Jin, Liang, 2023. "Government involvements and earnings management," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    3. Figueroa, Camila & Iberti, Gonzalo & Riutort, Julio & Wagner, Rodrigo, 2023. "Do firms that state they are financially constrained tend to reinvest more of their profits?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Xiang, Junyi & Zhang, Hongxiang & Dang, Dingyu & Guan, Jing, 2023. "Involuntary political connections and private firms' tax avoidance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Lu, Shengfeng & Sun, Yukun & Tian, Hui & Zhao, Yan, 2024. "Geographical proximity to government and corporate litigation behavior: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Wang, Xun & Yu, Jingwen, 2023. "COVID-19 pandemic and corporate liquidity: The role of SOEs’ trade credit response," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Xiao, Gang & Shen, Sichen, 2022. "To pollute or not to pollute: Political connections and corporate environmental performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Xiumei Liu & Fangbo Si & Chenxin Xie & Lu Xie, 2024. "Minority state ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese stock market crash in 2015," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 53(2), pages 291-325, June.
    9. Xiang, Junyi & Zhu, Ling & Kong, Dongmin, 2023. "Labor cost and corporate tax avoidance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 338-358.
    10. Zhaohua Li & Xiaofei Pan, 2023. "Relationship investment and local corruption environment: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4597-4628, December.
    11. Qiankun Gu & Jeong‐Bon Kim & Ke Liao & Yi Si, 2023. "Decentralising for local information? Evidence from state‐owned listed firms in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 5245-5276, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:33:y:2020:i:12:p:5555-5593.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.