IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v31y2018i12p4912-4957..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Got Rejected? Real Effects of Not Getting a Loan

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Berg

Abstract

Using a lender cutoff rule that generates plausibly exogenous variation in credit supply, I investigate a new channel through which funding shocks are transmitted to the real economy. Based on a sample of more than 15,000 loan applications from small- and medium-sized enterprises, I find that precautionary savings motives can aggravate real effects: low-liquidity firms whose loan applications were rejected increase cash holdings and cut noncash assets in excess of the requested loan amount. These results point to the amplifying effect of precautionary savings motives in the transmission of credit supply shocks. Received December 11, 2016; editorial decision February 22, 2018 by Editor Philip Strahan.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Berg, 2018. "Got Rejected? Real Effects of Not Getting a Loan," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(12), pages 4912-4957.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:31:y:2018:i:12:p:4912-4957.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhy038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:31:y:2018:i:12:p:4912-4957.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.