IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v30y2017i5p1744-1789..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financing and New Product Decisions of Private and Publicly Traded Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon M. Phillips
  • Giorgo Sertsios

Abstract

We exploit Medicare national coverage reimbursement approvals as a quasi-natural experiment to investigate how the financing decisions of private and publicly traded firms respond to changes in investment opportunities. We find that publicly traded companies increase their external financing and their subsequent product introductions by more than private companies in response to national coverage approvals. Private equity financing is the primary source of the increased financing for public firms. We show that the stock characteristics of publicly traded firms, such as liquidity and price informativeness, and product market competition are important factors in explaining their financing advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon M. Phillips & Giorgo Sertsios, 2017. "Financing and New Product Decisions of Private and Publicly Traded Firms," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(5), pages 1744-1789.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:30:y:2017:i:5:p:1744-1789.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhw106
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. French, Joseph J. & Fujitani, Ryosuke & Yasuda, Yukihiro, 2021. "Does stock market listing impact investment in Japan?," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Vojislav Maksimovic & Gordon Phillips & Liu Yang, 2023. "Do IPO Firms Become Myopic?," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(3), pages 765-807.
    3. Larrain, Borja & Sertsios, Giorgo & Francisco Urzúa I.,, 2021. "The going public decision of business group firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Liu, Zack & Schiff, Avishai & Swem, Nathan, 2024. "Access to capital and investment composition: Evidence from fracking in North Dakota," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Caio Machado & Ana Elisa Pereira, 2023. "Optimal Capital Structure with Stock Market Feedback," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(4), pages 1329-1371.
    6. Robert DeYoung & Lei Li, 2019. "Publicly Traded Versus Privately Held Commercial Banks: Sensitivity to Growth Opportunities," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 56(1), pages 39-71, August.
    7. Vojislav Maksimovic & Gordon M. Phillips & Liu Yang, 2019. "Do Public Firms Respond to Industry Opportunities More Than Private Firms? The Impact of Initial Firm Quality," NBER Working Papers 25634, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Abdulla, Yomna & Dang, Viet Anh & Khurshed, Arif, 2020. "Suppliers' listing status and trade credit provision," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Wang, Xin & Xie, Yan & Song, Di & Zhang, Weihua, 2022. "Do multiple large shareholders affect corporate bond yield spreads? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Josh Lerner & Amit Seru, 2017. "The Use and Misuse of Patent Data: Issues for Corporate Finance and Beyond," NBER Working Papers 24053, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Yano, Go & Shiraishi, Maho & Xu, Gang, 2024. "Effects of listing on the financial behavior of private-sector firms in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Dougal, Casey & Rettl, Daniel A., 2021. "Firm listing status and the investment home bias," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Vojislav Maksimovic & Gordon M. Phillips & Liu Yang, 2017. "Do Public Firms Respond to Investment Opportunities More than Private Firms? The Impact of Initial Firm Quality," NBER Working Papers 24104, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:30:y:2017:i:5:p:1744-1789.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.