IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v27y2014i12p3389-3440..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editor's Choice No News Is News: Do Markets Underreact to Nothing?

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Giglio
  • Kelly Shue

Abstract

As illustrated in the tale of "the dog that did not bark," the absence of news and the passage of time often contain information. We test whether markets fully incorporate this information using the empirical context of mergers. During the year after merger announcement, the passage of time is informative about the probability that the merger will ultimately complete. We show that the variation in hazard rates of completion after announcement strongly predicts returns. This pattern is consistent with a behavioral model of underreaction to the passage of time and cannot be explained by changes in risk or frictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Giglio & Kelly Shue, 2014. "Editor's Choice No News Is News: Do Markets Underreact to Nothing?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(12), pages 3389-3440.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:27:y:2014:i:12:p:3389-3440.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhu052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:27:y:2014:i:12:p:3389-3440.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.