IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v26y2013i12p3225-3265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Equity Volatility Explain the Global Loan Pricing Puzzle?

Author

Listed:
  • Lewis Gaul
  • Pinar Uysal

Abstract

This paper examines whether unobservable differences in firm volatility are responsible for the global loan pricing puzzle, which is the observation that corporate loan interest rates appear to be lower in Europe than in the United States. We analyze whether equity volatility, an error prone measure of firm volatility, can explain this difference in loan spreads. We show that using equity volatility in OLS regressions will result in biased and inconsistent estimates of the difference in U.S. and European loan spreads. We use instrumental variable methods to identify consistent estimates and find no difference in U.S. and European loan spreads. The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lewis Gaul & Pinar Uysal, 2013. "Can Equity Volatility Explain the Global Loan Pricing Puzzle?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(12), pages 3225-3265.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:26:y:2013:i:12:p:3225-3265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hht069
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tobias Berg & Anthony Saunders & Sascha Steffen & Daniel Streitz, 2017. "Mind the Gap: The Difference between U.S. and European Loan Rates," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(3), pages 948-987.
    2. Tobias Witter & Thorsten Sellhorn & Jens Müller & Vicky Kiosse, 2022. "Balance sheet smoothing," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0006, Berlin School of Economics.
    3. Burietz, A. & Ureche-Rangau, L., 2020. "Better the devil you know: Home and sectoral biases in bank lending," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 69-85.
    4. Chen, Jiayuan & Gong, Di & Muckley, Cal, 2020. "Stock market illiquidity, bargaining power and the cost of borrowing," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 181-206.
    5. Cook, Douglas O. & Luo, Shikong (Scott), 2023. "Fund flow-induced volatility and the cost of debt," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Burietz, Aurore & Oosterlinck, Kim & Szafarz, Ariane, 2017. "Europe vs. the U.S.: A new look at the syndicated loan pricing puzzle," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 50-53.
    7. Gong, D., 2014. "Bank Systemic Risk-Taking and Loan Pricing : Evidence from Syndicated Loans," Discussion Paper 2014-046, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Wagner, Wolf & Gong, Di, 2016. "Systemic risk-taking at banks: Evidence from the pricing of syndicated loans," CEPR Discussion Papers 11150, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Gong, Di & Jiang, Tao & Wu, Weixing, 2018. "A foreign currency effect in the syndicated loan market of emerging economies," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 211-226.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:26:y:2013:i:12:p:3225-3265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.