IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v3y1999i3p347-388..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Valuation of Contingent Claims under Portfolio Constraints: Reservation Buying and Selling Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Claus Munk

Abstract

With constrained portfolios contingent claims do not generally have a unique price that rules out arbitrage opportunities. Earlier studies have demonstrated that when there are constraints onthe hedge portfolio, a no-arbitrage price interval for any contingent claim exists. I consider the more realistic case where the constraints are imposed on the total portfolio of each investor and define reservation buying and selling prices for contingent claims. I derive properties of these prices, show how they can be computed numerically, and study two simple examples in which the reservation prices and the corresponding hedging strategies are compared to the Black–Scholes setting. JEL classification C63, D52, G11, G13.

Suggested Citation

  • Claus Munk, 1999. "The Valuation of Contingent Claims under Portfolio Constraints: Reservation Buying and Selling Prices," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 3(3), pages 347-388.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:3:y:1999:i:3:p:347-388.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1009856830088
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Benedetti & Luciano Campi, 2011. "Multivariate utility maximization with proportional transaction costs and random endowment," Working Papers hal-00586377, HAL.
    2. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 2020. "Conditional Davis pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 565-599, July.
    3. Damgaard, Anders, 2003. "Utility based option evaluation with proportional transaction costs," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 667-700, February.
    4. Simon Ellersgaard, 2019. "On the Numerical Solution of Mertonian Control Problems: A Survey of the Markov Chain Approximation Method for the Working Economist," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 1179-1211, October.
    5. Munk, Claus & Sørensen, Carsten, 2010. "Dynamic asset allocation with stochastic income and interest rates," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 433-462, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • D52 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Incomplete Markets
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:3:y:1999:i:3:p:347-388.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.