IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v29y2025i1p201-239..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large orders in small markets: execution with endogenous liquidity supply

Author

Listed:
  • Agostino Capponi
  • Albert J. Menkveld
  • Hongzhong Zhang

Abstract

We model the execution of a large uninformed sell order in the presence of strategic competitive market makers. We solve for the unique symmetric equilibrium of the model in closed form. Analysis of this equilibrium reveals that large orders unequivocally benefit market makers, while smaller investors stand to benefit only if the order trades with a sufficiently high intensity. The equilibrium results further provide a rationale for the empirically observed patterns of (1) shorter orders trading at higher intensities and (2) price pressures potentially subsiding before large orders stop executing.

Suggested Citation

  • Agostino Capponi & Albert J. Menkveld & Hongzhong Zhang, 2025. "Large orders in small markets: execution with endogenous liquidity supply," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 29(1), pages 201-239.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:29:y:2025:i:1:p:201-239.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfae036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    large orders; liquidity; market makers; small investors;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G19 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:29:y:2025:i:1:p:201-239.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.