IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v28y2024i5p1451-1482..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The labor effects of R&D tax incentives: evidence from VC-backed startups

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Chen
  • Shenje Hshieh

Abstract

We evaluate the impact of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015, which allowed some existing venture-capital-backed startups to monetize their research and development (R&D) tax credits against payroll taxes in the United States. We show that marginally eligible startups increase their demand for R&D workers more than marginally ineligible startups after the PATH Act’s enactment. These effects are stronger among startups that are financially constrained. Marginally eligible startups subsequently recruit workers with more education and experience and file more patents with new inventors. Our findings suggest payroll tax credits are effective in scaling startups and stimulating R&D activities through skilled labor recruitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Chen & Shenje Hshieh, 2024. "The labor effects of R&D tax incentives: evidence from VC-backed startups," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(5), pages 1451-1482.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:28:y:2024:i:5:p:1451-1482.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfae026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:28:y:2024:i:5:p:1451-1482.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.