IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v25y2021i2p365-402..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Persistence of Fee Dispersion among Mutual Funds
[The emerging landscape of retail e-commerce]

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J Cooper
  • Michael Halling
  • Wenhao Yang

Abstract

Previous work shows large differences in fees for S&P 500 index funds and other funds and suggests that investors suffer wealth losses investing in high-fee funds when similar low-fee funds are available. In contrast, the neoclassical model of mutual funds (Berk and van Binsbergen, 2015, J. Financ. Econ., 118, 1–20) argues that percentage fees are irrelevant, as fund size will adjust in equilibrium such that net alphas are equal to zero. We show that fees matter from an investor perspective. We document (i) a strong negative association between net-of-fee fund performance and fees in a sample of all US and international equity funds, (ii) economically large, robust, persistent, and pervasive fee dispersion in the mutual fund industry, and (iii) important economic effects for investors. During the sample period, the mutual fund industry has generated a total value lost (i.e., a negative net value added) of 125 billion USD, coming predominantly from high-fee funds.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J Cooper & Michael Halling & Wenhao Yang, 2021. "The Persistence of Fee Dispersion among Mutual Funds [The emerging landscape of retail e-commerce]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 365-402.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:25:y:2021:i:2:p:365-402.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfaa023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hitzemann, Steffen & Sokolinski, Stanislav & Tai, Mingzhu, 2022. "Paying for beta: Leverage demand and asset management fees," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 105-128.
    2. Fricke, Daniel & Greppmair, Stefan & Paludkiewicz, Karol, 2022. "You can't always get what you want (where you want it): Cross-border effects of the US money market fund reform," Discussion Papers 03/2022, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    3. Laurent Barras & Patrick Gagliardini & Olivier Scaillet, 2022. "Skill, Scale, and Value Creation in the Mutual Fund Industry," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(1), pages 601-638, February.
    4. Katarzyna Perez & £ukasz Szymczyk, 2022. "Actual rate of the management fee in mutual funds of different styles," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(4), pages 969-1014, December.
    5. Yue Xu, 2022. "Reallocation of Mutual Fund Managers and Capital Raising Ability," CREATES Research Papers 2022-11, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    6. Choi, Hae Mi & Gupta-Mukherjee, Swasti, 2022. "Price sensitivity of the consumer-investor: Evidence from energy prices and mutual fund fees," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    7. Fricke, Daniel & Greppmair, Stefan & Paludkiewicz, Karol, 2024. "You can’t always get what you want (where you want it): Cross-border effects of the US money market fund reform," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Yue Xu, 2021. "Spillovers of Senior Mutual Fund Managers’ Capital Raising Ability," CREATES Research Papers 2022-03, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    9. Fröberg, Emelie & Halling, Michael, 2024. "Do investors benefit from MiFID II unbundling?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mutual funds; Fund fees; Fund expenses; Price dispersion; Price persistence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:25:y:2021:i:2:p:365-402.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.