IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v21y2017i5p1975-2005..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Spot Market Short-Sale Constraints on Index Futures Trading

Author

Listed:
  • Frank J. Fabozzi
  • Ahmet K. Karagozoglu
  • Na Wang

Abstract

We analyze the effects of spot market short-sale constraints on derivatives trading using a unique Chinese stock market futures trading database. Due to short-sale constraints, investors’ pessimistic views on the underlying index can be expressed solely through short futures positions, while investors’ optimistic views are dispersed through their spot and futures trading. We hypothesize that trading of pessimistic investors (with net short futures positions) contains more information than that of optimistic investors. We document the negative volatility–volume relation is associated with pessimistic investors’ trading, which attenuates with less-restricted spot market short-sale rules. Large pessimistic investors’ net demand can predict future returns, but not the case for optimistic investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank J. Fabozzi & Ahmet K. Karagozoglu & Na Wang, 2017. "Effects of Spot Market Short-Sale Constraints on Index Futures Trading," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 21(5), pages 1975-2005.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:21:y:2017:i:5:p:1975-2005.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfw020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Xiaotao & Zhao, Yuepeng & Wang, Ziqiao, 2024. "Do loosened trading rules restore the stock index futures price discovery ability in China?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 389-397.
    2. Tan, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Zili & Zhao, Xuejun & Wang, Chengxiang, 2021. "Investor sentiment and limits of arbitrage: Evidence from Chinese stock market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 577-595.
    3. Ryu, Doojin & Ryu, Doowon & Yang, Heejin, 2023. "Investor sentiment and futures market mispricing," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    4. Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Sensoy, Ahmet & Sousa, Ricardo M. & Salah Uddin, Gazi, 2020. "U.S. equity and commodity futures markets: Hedging or financialization?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:21:y:2017:i:5:p:1975-2005.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.