IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v17y2013i6p1989-2033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance and Equity Prices: Does Transparency Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Lifeng Gu
  • Dirk Hackbarth

Abstract

This article examines how accounting transparency and corporate governance interact. Firms with better governance are associated with higher abnormal returns, but even more so if they also have higher transparency. The effect is largely monotonic--it is small and insignificant for opaque firms and large and significant for transparent firms--and survives numerous robustness tests. We find supportive evidence for firm value and operating performance. Hence, governance and transparency are complements. This complementarity effect is consistent with the view that more transparent firms are more likely takeover targets, because acquirers can bid more effectively and identify synergies more precisely. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lifeng Gu & Dirk Hackbarth, 2013. "Governance and Equity Prices: Does Transparency Matter?," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 17(6), pages 1989-2033.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:17:y:2013:i:6:p:1989-2033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfs047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sana Ben Hassine & Claude Francoeur, 2024. "Do Corporate Ethics Enhance Financial Analysts’ Behavior and Performance?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Houdou Basse Mama & Alexander Bassen, 2017. "Neglected disciplinary effects of investor relations: evidence from corporate cash holdings," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 221-261, February.
    3. Bui, Dien Giau & Chen, Yehning & Chen, Yan-Shing & Lin, Chih-Yung, 2023. "Managerial ability and financial statement disaggregation decisions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Houdou Basse Mama & Rachidi Kotchoni, 2017. "Investor Relations' Quality and Mispricing," Working Papers hal-04141636, HAL.
    5. Guo, Yifeng & Mota, Lira, 2021. "Should information be sold separately? Evidence from MiFID II," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 97-126.
    6. Kose John & Qianru Qi & Jing Wang, 2020. "Bank Integration and the Market for Corporate Control: Evidence from Cross-State Acquisitions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 3277-3294, July.
    7. Lixiong Guo & Patrick Lach & Shawn Mobbs, 2015. "Tradeoffs between Internal and External Governance: Evidence from Exogenous Regulatory Shocks," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(1), pages 81-114, March.
    8. Ramón Bermejo Climent & Isabel Figuerola-Ferretti Garrigues & Ioannis Paraskevopoulos & Alvaro Santos, 2021. "ESG Disclosure and Portfolio Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Michel, Allen & Oded, Jacob & Shaked, Israel, 2020. "Institutional investors and firm performance: Evidence from IPOs," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Campbell, T. Colin & Thompson, Mary Elizabeth, 2015. "Why are CEOs paid for good luck? An empirical comparison of explanations for pay-for-luck asymmetry," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 247-264.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:17:y:2013:i:6:p:1989-2033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.