IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v21y1999i2p288-304..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural Resource and Environmental Economics: A Retrospective View

Author

Listed:
  • Emery N. Castle

Abstract

This article reviews the methodological and theoretical foundations of natural resource and environmental economics prior to an examination of three examples of topics of current interest in the field. The three examples are nonmarket values, benefit—cost analysis, and the new institutional economics. The article draws on the review of contemporary work to identify a number of topics deserving of attention in subsequent work in this field. The items listed would have the effect of making future research more particular and less doctrinaire.

Suggested Citation

  • Emery N. Castle, 1999. "Natural Resource and Environmental Economics: A Retrospective View," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 288-304.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:21:y:1999:i:2:p:288-304.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349880
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danny García Callejas, 2007. "Biology and Economics: Metaphors that Economists usually take from Biology," Revista Ecos de Economía, Universidad EAFIT, March.
    2. Belyi, Andrei V., 2016. "Why is the oil price not about equilibrium?: An economic sociology account of petroleum markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 45-49.
    3. Martin Machay, 2018. "Land Degradation in the Calorie Model: Dynamics of the Stationary State," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 66(6), pages 1543-1547.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:21:y:1999:i:2:p:288-304.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.