IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v19y1997i2p308-325..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Industrial Development: To Cluster or Not to Cluster?

Author

Listed:
  • David L. Barkley
  • Mark S. Henry

Abstract

Current regional industrialization strategies encourage recruitment, small business development, and business retention and expansion efforts to promote industry cluster development. In this paper, we provide an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of promoting industry clusters as an industrial development alternative for rural areas. Advantages of successful cluster promotion include stronger external economies, a more conducive environment for industrial reorganization, greater networking among firms, and more efficient use of public resources. The disadvantages of an industry cluster approach are selecting industries to target, overcoming latecomer disadvantages, and providing supportive institutions. Findings indicate that an industry cluster strategy is not appropriate for many rural communities. Areas considering cluster promotion should compare costs of initiating or expanding a cluster with the potential benefits of successful cluster development.

Suggested Citation

  • David L. Barkley & Mark S. Henry, 1997. "Rural Industrial Development: To Cluster or Not to Cluster?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 308-325.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:2:p:308-325.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349744
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:2:p:308-325.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.