IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v92y2025i1p339-364..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Politicians: Experimental Evidence on Motivations for Political Candidacy and Government Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Saad Gulzar
  • Muhammad Yasir Khan

Abstract

How can we motivate good politicians—those that will carry out policy that is responsive to citizens’ preferences—to enter politics? In a field experiment in Pakistan, we vary how political office is portrayed to ordinary citizens. Emphasizing prosocial motives for holding political office instead of personal returns—such as the ability to help others versus enhancing one’s own respect and status—raises the likelihood that individuals run for office and that voters elect them. A year later, the treatment improves the alignment of policy with citizens’ preferences. These effects emerge only when treatments are randomly delivered in a public setting. Taken together, the results demonstrate that how politics is perceived shapes who decides to run for office, who is elected, as well the policies that democracies deliver.

Suggested Citation

  • Saad Gulzar & Muhammad Yasir Khan, 2025. "Good Politicians: Experimental Evidence on Motivations for Political Candidacy and Government Performance," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 92(1), pages 339-364.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:92:y:2025:i:1:p:339-364.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdae026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:92:y:2025:i:1:p:339-364.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.