IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v91y2024i5p2916-2953..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Path Dependency in Physician Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence Jin
  • Rui Tang
  • Han Ye
  • Junjian Yi
  • Songfa Zhong

Abstract

We examine path dependency in physician decisions in an emergency department setting, and find that physicians’ treatment decisions for the current and previous patients are positively correlated. We show that the positive autocorrelation is higher when the current patient is of greater medical uncertainty or more similar to the previous patient in terms of observed characteristics and when the physician is less experienced or more fatigued. We then show that these patterns are highly consistent with the memory and attention model, whereby the physician’s current decision is anchored to her previous decision. The results from both reduced-form analyses and structural estimations provide further support for the importance of memory and attention in physician decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence Jin & Rui Tang & Han Ye & Junjian Yi & Songfa Zhong, 2024. "Path Dependency in Physician Decisions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(5), pages 2916-2953.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:91:y:2024:i:5:p:2916-2953.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdad096
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:91:y:2024:i:5:p:2916-2953.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.