IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v19y1951i2p90-104..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Cambridge Controversies in Monetary Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Harry G. Johnson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry G. Johnson, 1951. "Some Cambridge Controversies in Monetary Theory," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 90-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:19:y:1951:i:2:p:90-104.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2295737
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kehrwald, Bernie, 2014. "The Interest Rate in a Monetary Economy," MPRA Paper 102388, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 12 Aug 2020.
    2. K. Vela Velupillai, 2011. "Postkeynesian Precepts for Nonlinear, Endogenous, Nonstochastic, Business Cycle Theories," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1107, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    3. K. Vela Velupillai, 2012. "Ferdinando Targetti - In Memorium Scholar, Friend, Colleague- and a Gentleman," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1208, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    4. Kehrwald, Bernie, 2014. "The Excess Demand Theory of Money," MPRA Paper 57603, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:19:y:1951:i:2:p:90-104.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.