IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/refreg/v10y2024i2p213-242..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On DeFi and On-Chain CeFi: How (Not) to Regulate Decentralized Finance

Author

Listed:
  • Katrin Schuler
  • Ann Sofie Cloots
  • Fabian Schär

Abstract

This article proposes a framework to assess the factual decentralization of blockchain-based financial infrastructure, commonly referred to as ‘decentralized finance’ (DeFi). It discusses various centralization vectors along the DeFi architecture layers from a technological and legal point of view. Distinguishing between endogenous and inherited centralization, the importance of decentralization assessments for regulators is demonstrated. First, centralization vectors are a strong indication that a DeFi project may have (some) custodial properties warranting regulation. Second, centralization vectors reveal the avenues of control in projects, pointing out appropriate regulatory hooks. The article serves as an interdisciplinary introduction that analyses blockchain-based financial infrastructure and provides policymakers and regulators with a tool to identify the differences between truly independent, neutral infrastructure and fake decentralization. It concludes that the former may have very beneficial properties and can contribute towards a more open and transparent financial system, while the latter is a blockchain-based form of financial intermediation and should be regulated as such.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrin Schuler & Ann Sofie Cloots & Fabian Schär, 2024. "On DeFi and On-Chain CeFi: How (Not) to Regulate Decentralized Finance," Journal of Financial Regulation, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 213-242.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:refreg:v:10:y:2024:i:2:p:213-242.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jfr/fjad014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:refreg:v:10:y:2024:i:2:p:213-242.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jfr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.