IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rcorpf/v9y2020i2p302-339..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Executives Exercise Their Stock Options?
[Are executive stock option exercises driven by private information?]

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Klein
  • Ernst Maug

Abstract

We analyze how 14,000 top U.S. executives exercise their stock options. Factors suggested by existing theories have low or moderate explanatory power. Variables that model executives’ motive to diversify fare particularly poorly, whereas variables that capture reference-dependent preference, such as past highs and lows of stock prices, perform better. By contrast, characteristics of option portfolios are of first-order importance and suggest that managers have target ownership levels. Institutional features like vesting restrictions or blackout periods also have a first-order impact. We conclude that executives’ main motivations for exercising stock options early seem to be outside the scope of extant models. (JEL G30, M52)Received August 20, 2018; editorial decision December 28, 2019 by Editor Andrew Ellul.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Klein & Ernst Maug, 2020. "How Do Executives Exercise Their Stock Options? [Are executive stock option exercises driven by private information?]," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(2), pages 302-339.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:302-339.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingolf Dittmann & Amy Yazhu Li & Stefan Obernberger & Jiaqi Zheng, 2022. "The corporate calendar and the timing of share repurchases and equity compensation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-101/IV, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Liu, Claire & Masulis, Ronald W. & Stanfield, Jared, 2021. "Why CEO option compensation can be a bad option for shareholders: Evidence from major customer relationships," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 453-481.
    3. Stefano Colonnello & Giuliano Curatola & Shuo Xia, 2022. "Trading Away Incentives," Working Papers 2022:16, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • M52 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:302-339.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rcfs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.