IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v99y1984i4p673-691..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Production Theory Perspective on Collective Choice Theory

Author

Listed:
  • John Fountain

Abstract

Basic production theory concepts of separability and externalities are used to provide an intuitive, unifying explanation of Arrow's original possibility theorem and later variants of it due to Sen, Wilson, Mas-Colell, and Sonnenschein, of the libertarian paradoxes of Sen and Gibbard, and of the single-profile possibility theorem of Parks. These important results in collective choice theory are shown to be the result of imposing on a multiple-output production process both externality-requiring and externality-denying characteristics. In each of these cases various consistency conditions on social preference and input-output links like citizens' sovereignty or the Pareto principle create external effects in production that interact with an externality-denying characteristic of separability to create a production process with zero marginal input productivity in certain regions of input space.

Suggested Citation

  • John Fountain, 1984. "A Production Theory Perspective on Collective Choice Theory," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 99(4), pages 673-691.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:99:y:1984:i:4:p:673-691.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1883120
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Fountain, 2000. "A simple graphical proof of arrow's impossibility theorem," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 89-110.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:99:y:1984:i:4:p:673-691.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.