IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v94y1980i1p185-194..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monopoly and the Distribution of Wealth: A Reappraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Lacy Glenn Thomas

Abstract

In a recent article William Comanor and Robert Smiley [1975] attempt assessment of the impact of multi-industry monopoly on the personal distribution of wealth in the United States. The conclusions of their study are striking: possibly one-half of existing wealth holdings by the richest 2.4 percent of American households is due entirely to capitalized monopoly gains. Yet the methods by which this and similar estimates are obtained suffer from certain difficulties: first with regard to the theoretical framework implicit in the estimation procedure, and second with regard to several parameters used in the application of this framework. The following two sections, respectively, present these difficulties.

Suggested Citation

  • Lacy Glenn Thomas, 1980. "Monopoly and the Distribution of Wealth: A Reappraisal," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 94(1), pages 185-194.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:94:y:1980:i:1:p:185-194.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1884612
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colonescu Constantin, 2021. "Price Markups and Upstreamness in World Input-Output Data," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 71-85, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:94:y:1980:i:1:p:185-194.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.