IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v81y1967i4p695-699..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit-Cost Analysis: Its Relevance to Public Investment Decisions: Comment

Author

Listed:
  • Robert H. Haveman

Abstract

This is a critique of the Arthur Maass article on Benefit Cost Analysis.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Robert H. Haveman, 1967. "Benefit-Cost Analysis: Its Relevance to Public Investment Decisions: Comment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 81(4), pages 695-699.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:81:y:1967:i:4:p:695-699.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1885588
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert H. Haveman, 1977. "On Evaluating the Regional Impact of Public Policy," NBER Chapters, in: Explorations in Economic Research, Volume 4, number 3 (New Directions in Federal Economic Development Programs), pages 429-444, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ronald C. Griffin, 2012. "The Origins and Ideals of Water Resource Economics in the United States," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 4(1), pages 353-377, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:81:y:1967:i:4:p:695-699.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.