IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v67y1953i4p564-575..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Retarded Acceptance of the Marginal Utility Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Emil Kauder

Abstract

Introduction, 564. — I. Importance of religious backgrounds in seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 565. — II. Place of work in social theology, 566. — III. Delayed acceptance in the nineteenth century, 570. — IV. Conclusion, 573.

Suggested Citation

  • Emil Kauder, 1953. "The Retarded Acceptance of the Marginal Utility Theory," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 67(4), pages 564-575.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:67:y:1953:i:4:p:564-575.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1883602
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Kolev & Erwin Dekker, 2023. "Carl Menger’s Smithian contributions to German political economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 247-269, June.
    2. Vergés Josep C., 2000. "The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has To Say in the Age of Corruption," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, June.
    3. Killion, M. Ulric, 2009. "Relation of game theory to economic history and marginalism," MPRA Paper 13378, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Janek Wasserman, 2020. "Science lost, science found in the post WWII Austrian economics movement: The case of Emil Kauder," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 107-120, March.
    5. Obrimah, Oghenovo A., 2024. "Measuring Innovativeness: A ranking of the ordinal utility from consumption is more robust than either of ‘outcomes of commercialization’ or patent counts," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 603-616.
    6. Vergés Josep C., 2000. "The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has to Say in the Age of Corruption," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2-3), pages 253-284, June.
    7. Pirgmaier, Elke, 2021. "The value of value theory for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Peter Hans Matthews & Andreas Ortmann, 2002. "An Austrian (Mis)Reads Adam Smith: A critique of Rothbard as intellectual historian," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 379-392.
    9. Prychitko David L., 2003. "Catholicism, Calvinism, and the Comparative Developement of Economic Doctrine," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:67:y:1953:i:4:p:564-575.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.