IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v46y1932i2p316-347..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics and Sociology: Marshall in Relation to the Thought of his Time

Author

Listed:
  • Talcott Parsons

Abstract

Introductory. I. Marshall and Max Weber on Capitalism, 317. II. The Main Lines of English Social Thought, 321. III. Marshall's Relation to the English Tradition, 330. IV. Economics and Sociology: Marshall's Difficulties, 336. V. Possible Alternatives to Marshall's position; (a) Pareto, 339, (b) Weber, 343. Conclusion, 345.

Suggested Citation

  • Talcott Parsons, 1932. "Economics and Sociology: Marshall in Relation to the Thought of his Time," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 46(2), pages 316-347.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:46:y:1932:i:2:p:316-347.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1883233
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lall Ramrattan, 2009. "Hinduism and Economic Crises," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 53(1), pages 35-47, March.
    2. Milan Zafirovski, 2024. "Contradictions of the Marginal Utility Theory of Value? Identifying Some Logical Errors," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(1), pages 53-98.
    3. Joanna Dzionek-Kozlowska, 2015. "Alfred Marshall's Puzzles. Between Economics as a Positive Science and Economic Chivalry," Lodz Economics Working Papers 5/2015, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology.
    4. Richard Swedberg, 2015. "Schumpeter and Talcott Parsons," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 215-222, January.
    5. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2024. "Social Darwinism Revisited: How four critics altered the meaning of a near-obsolete term, greatly increased its usage, and thereby changed social science," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 403-427, April.
    6. Paul Dalziel & Jane Higgins, 2006. "Pareto, Parsons, and the Boundary Between Economics and Sociology," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(1), pages 109-126, January.
    7. Neil J. Smelser, 1992. "The Rational Choice Perspective," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(4), pages 381-410, October.
    8. Roger E. Backhouse & Bradley W. Bateman & Steven G. Medema, 2010. "The Reception of Marshall in the United States," Chapters, in: Tiziano Raffaelli & Giacomo Becattini & Katia Caldari & Marco Dardi (ed.), The Impact of Alfred Marshall’s Ideas, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Priti Narayan & Emily Rosenman, 2022. "From crisis to the everyday: Shouldn't we all be writing economies?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 392-404, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:46:y:1932:i:2:p:316-347.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.