IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v44y1930i3p493-522..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Split Inventory: A War Expedient, A Solution in Peace

Author

Listed:
  • E. M. Bernstein

Abstract

I. Origin of the split inventory. — Definition, 493.—The splitting date, 494. — Built-up value, 494. — Relation to pre-war valuation procedure, 495. — Objects of war-time valuation, 497. — Other war-time methods of valuation, 497. — Superiority of the split inventory, 498. — II. Development of the split inventory. — Early use of this method, 499. — Brooklyn Borough Gas case, 500. — The split inventory in the District of Columbia, 502. — The split inventory in Wisconsin, 506. — The Ashland decision, 508. — The end of the split inventory, 509. — III. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the split inventory. — The Commission's policy, 510. — The Transportation Act of 1920, 511. — The O'Fallon valuation, 512. — The source of the Commission's policy, 512. — IV. The split inventory in the Supreme Court. — The Galveston case, 513. — The Georgia case, 514. — The OTallon case, 515. — V. The split inventory in the future. — Its relation to prudent investment, 517. — Present conditions are favorable, 519. — The attitude of utilities, 520. — The attitude of the courts, 521.

Suggested Citation

  • E. M. Bernstein, 1930. "The Split Inventory: A War Expedient, A Solution in Peace," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 44(3), pages 493-522.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:44:y:1930:i:3:p:493-522.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1885793
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:44:y:1930:i:3:p:493-522.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.