IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v31y1917i4p690-704..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General Intelligence and Wages

Author

Listed:
  • Robert M. Woodbury

Abstract

Unsatisfactory discussion of the subject by economists, 690. — The Binet tests of general intelligence, 691. — Applications in educational psychology, 692. — Application to relation between intelligence and earnings, 694. — Large possibilities of the method, 697. — Need of separating tests of intelligence from those testing environment and schooling, 698. — Vocational guidance, 701. — Conclusion, 703.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert M. Woodbury, 1917. "General Intelligence and Wages," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 31(4), pages 690-704.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:31:y:1917:i:4:p:690-704.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1884041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kretschmer, Tobias & Khashabi, Pooyan & Mohammadi, Ali & Raffiee, Joseph, 2020. "Cognitive Ability and Employee Mobility: Evidence from Swedish Microdata," CEPR Discussion Papers 15265, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:31:y:1917:i:4:p:690-704.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.