IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v31y1917i2p259-306..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The German Steel Syndicate

Author

Listed:
  • H. R. Tosdal

Abstract

Introductory, 257. — I. The first period, 1904–07, 260. — Efforts to increase control, 260. — The open hearth works, 261. — Syndication of B-products, 262. — Agreements with foreign producers, 266. — II. The second period, 1907–12, 267.— Renewal problems, 268. — Works dealers, 270. — Allotments, 271. — Renewal, 272. — Changes and readjustments, 272. — Upper Silesian Syndicate, 274. — Relations with open hearth works, 274. — Combination in B-products, 275. — III. Third period. Extension of the syndicate, 1912–17, 276. — Chief difficulties, 276. — Removal of restrictions on B-products, 277. — The syndicate since 1912, 280. — Attempts to syndicate B-products, 282. — Influence of the war, 284. — IV. The price policy of the steel syndicate, 284. — Domestic prices, comparison, criticism, 284. — Export prices and export bounties, 286. — Relations of the syndicate with buyers, 287. — V. Influence of the steel syndicate upon the industry, 289. — Upon the profitableness of constituent enterprises, 290. — Allotments and sales, 290. — Growth of integration, 291. — Over-expansion, 291. — Conflict between integrated and non-integrated works, 293. — VI. The steel syndicate and middlemen, 299. — Organization of dealers under syndicate control, 300. — Advantages and disadvantages to dealers, 300. — VII. Conclusion. 303.

Suggested Citation

  • H. R. Tosdal, 1917. "The German Steel Syndicate," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 31(2), pages 259-306.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:31:y:1917:i:2:p:259-306.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1883911
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaideep Shenoy, 2012. "An Examination of the Efficiency, Foreclosure, and Collusion Rationales for Vertical Takeovers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(8), pages 1482-1501, August.
    2. Volker Nocke & Lucy White, 2007. "Do Vertical Mergers Facilitate Upstream Collusion?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1321-1339, September.
    3. Volker Nocke & Lucy White, 2003. "Do Vertical Mergers Facilitate Upstream Collusion? Second Version," PIER Working Paper Archive 05-013, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 08 Mar 2005.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:31:y:1917:i:2:p:259-306.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.