IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v139y2024i4p2579-2635..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lifetime Impacts of the New Deal's Youth Employment Program

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Aizer
  • Nancy Early
  • Shari Eli
  • Guido Imbens
  • Keyoung Lee
  • Adriana Lleras-Muney
  • Alexander Strand

Abstract

We study the lifetime effects of the first and largest American youth employment and training program in the United States—the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), 1933–1942. We match newly digitized enrollee records to census, World War II enlistment, Social Security, and death records. We find that longer service in the CCC led to improvements in height, health status, longevity, geographic mobility, and lifetime earnings but did not improve short-term labor market outcomes, including employment and wages. We address potential selection into CCC duration using several approaches, most importantly two newly developed control-function approaches that leverage unbiased estimates of the short-term effects of a randomized controlled trial of Job Corps (the modern version of the CCC). Our findings suggest that short- and medium-term evaluations of employment programs underestimate effects because they fail to capture lifetime effects and often ignore or underestimate health and longevity benefits that increase in magnitude at later ages.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Aizer & Nancy Early & Shari Eli & Guido Imbens & Keyoung Lee & Adriana Lleras-Muney & Alexander Strand, 2024. "The Lifetime Impacts of the New Deal's Youth Employment Program," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(4), pages 2579-2635.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:139:y:2024:i:4:p:2579-2635.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjae016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:139:y:2024:i:4:p:2579-2635.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.